Its location in the double meander of the river, in a hilly landscape and between its two castles is truly unique. This is why the city has been a challenge for architects both in the past and at present.

The cycle Gloss of Prague’s Architecture which we will be continuously publishing on this website, will deal with contemporary architecture built after the Velvet Revolution. We will write about both successful and unsuccessful architecture, however, our main focus will be on works that have sprung up everywhere around us. We will strive to bring closer contemporary realizations on different scales from S to XL, from a nice bench in a park to big architectural complexes. We will not be governed by continuity in time, but more so by geographical and typological features.

The geographical features simply determine the position of buildings in the city, where whole districts have been completely rebuilt, such as Karlin or a large part of Smichov. Typological features allow us to compare realizations of one building type on different locations, e.g. housing construction, administration, shopping centres or e.g. a Prague’s speciality – city arcades and passage ways.

Another criterium on which we might base the selection of buildings for our cycle could be the architect’s personality, as a great number of architectural celebrities have worked in our city in the last fifteen years whether it has been with bigger or smaller success, devoutness and zeal. We will certainly find here different realizations by most of our leading architects of all contemporary generations.

In short, we have enough to write about so we will try. We hope that we will also manage to bring to your attention small features, that you normally wouldn’t even notice without being told about them and yet they can represent very good architecture following the motto „ simplicity means strength.

We live in a time where a great many things compete for our attention. This is why we would like to draw your attention to some of them and point out why some of them were not so successful and ended up the way they did.

Ing. Arch. Filip Soukup